The NHL playoff format is a topic that gets discussed a lot. However, I don&#8217;t think a format change is necessary.

Let&#8217;s start with why some fans, media, and players don&#8217;t like it. They argue that you play the same team too often and that some series have two really good teams go head-to-head.
Colorado&#8217;s Cale Makar said this to ESPN&#8217;s Greg Wyshynski <a href="https://www.espn.com/nhl/story/_/id/46260627/nhl-2025-26-star-top-players-roundtable-playoffs-meals-dress-code">in his article from Vegas,</a> &#8220;I feel like all the players want back to No. 1 against No. 8. I think that&#8217;s a thing that we&#8217;d like, but I get it. I understand the playoff format now. It makes the road harder sometimes.&#8221;
When asked about how some players said the wild-card locks in the same matchups every year, Makar said, &#8220;I mean, if you&#8217;re from Edmonton or L.A., I&#8217;d say so, yeah. Sometimes you get a good matchup, and sometimes you&#8217;re playing a top-six team with another top-six team, like we did this past year. That&#8217;s the way she goes.&#8221;
Let&#8217;s look at the past few seasons and see if the current format makes it harder for certain teams.
2022 Eastern Conference:
Current:                                            1 vs. 8 Format 
FLA (122) v. WSH (100)              FLA (122) v. WSH (100) 
CAR (116) v. BOS (107)                CAR (116) v. PIT (103) 
TOR (115) v. TBL (110)                 TOR (115) v. BOS (107) 
NYR (110) v. PIT (103)                 NYR (110) v. TBL (110)
All Eastern teams this year had at least 100 points. The same four teams would have had home ice advantage, but different opponents. Toronto lost to Tampa Bay in the first round. Maybe they would have beaten Boston, but history between the two teams says otherwise.
FLA, TB, CAR, and NYR won their series, so if it were 1 vs. 8, those four couldn&#8217;t have advanced, as one of TOR or BOS would have. The rest would be &#8220;what if&#8221; scenarios and simply a prediction of who would have won or not. I&#8217;m not sold that the 1 v. 8 would have made the playoffs better in the East.
2022 Western Conference: 
Current                                          1 vs. 8 
COL (119) v. NSH (97)              COL (119) v. NSH (97) 
CGY (111) v. DAL (98)               CGY (111) v. DAL (98) 
MIN (113) v. STL (109)             MIN (113) v. LAK (99) 
EDM (104) v. LA (99)               STL (109) v. EDM (104)
The top two series would be the same, but MIN and EDM would have swapped opponents. St. Louis would have had home ice and faced Edmonton. It would have led to significantly more travel for Minnesota — unless you removed the division, winner being guaranteed the No. 1 and No. 2 slots.
Colorado was clearly the best team, and they beat NSH, STL, and EDM to get out of the West. Would a format change have made their road easier? Hard to say, but it would have been different, as they played STL and EDM in the second and third round, and in 1 vs. 8, one of those two would have been eliminated in the first round.
Colorado was a wagon, and I&#8217;m not sure any team would have beaten them regardless of the format.
2023 Eastern Conference:
Current:                                            1 vs. 8 
BOS (135) v. FLA (92)                  BOS (135) v. FLA (92) 
CAR (113) v. NYI (93)                   CAR (113) v. NYI (93) 
TOR (111) v. TBL (98)                   NJD (112) v. TBL (98) 
NJD (112) v. NYR (107)                TOR (111) v. NYR (107)
The top-two series would have been the same, while Toronto would have played the Rangers instead of Tampa Bay, and New Jersey would have faced the Lightning.
Florida, Carolina, Toronto, and New Jersey won in 2023. Would you rather watch two non-divisional rivals or TOR-TBL and NYR-NJD? I prefer rivalries, so I&#8217;d rather have seen the matchups we saw. Toronto finally defeated Tampa Bay, so would Leafs fans change that without a guarantee they&#8217;d beat a Rangers team that had nine more points than Tampa?
2023 Western Conference: 
Current                                          1 vs. 8 
VGK (111) v. WPG (95)               VGK (111) v. WPG (95) 
COL (109) v. SEA (100)              COL (109) v. SEA (100) 
EDM (104) v. LA (104)               EDM (104) v. MIN (103) 
DAL (108) v. MIN (103)             DAL (108) v. LA (104)
The top two series remain the same. Edmonton and Dallas still would have had home ice advantage; they just would have played different opponents. I&#8217;d argue that for Dallas and Edmonton, it would be a disadvantage under the 1 vs. 8, because they&#8217;d have more travel, due to LA having one more point than MIN.
Vegas would have played Seattle in the second round as they upset Colorado. Vegas beat EDM in the second round, and I think most would agree they were a better team than SEA, and I still think VGK would have won the West. We will never know, of course, but the current playoff format is better for the Western Conference due to travel. If you go 1. vs. 8, you are adding more potential travel.
Which is why: If you have four teams from each division in the playoffs, there really should be no wildcard seeding. I&#8217;d only use Wildcard when it is five from one division and three from another. Vegas would have played Seattle in the first round, and Colorado would have played Winnipeg under my plan. I much prefer that, as it sticks with the current focus of division rivalries and having more regular-season games within your division. But I digress.
2024 Eastern Conference:
Current:                                            1 vs. 8 
NYR (114) v. WSH (91)                NYR (114) v. WSH (91) 
FLA (113) v. TBL (98)                  FLA (113) v. NYI (94) 
CAR (111) v. NYI (94)                   CAR (112) v. TBL (98) 
BOS (109) v. TOR (102)               BOS (109) v. TOR (102)
The first and fourth series would have been the same in 1 vs. 8, but FLA would have played NYI while CAR would have hosted TBL. It would have taken away the FLA/TB rivalry, which was essentially the passing of the guard. Tampa had made three consecutive Stanley Cup Finals from 2020-2022, but FLA beat them, and now the Panthers have made three in a row (2023-2025), and like Tampa, they&#8217;ve won twice.
Maybe Tampa would have beaten Carolina and then faced Florida in the second round, but that&#8217;s only a what-if. The top four teams in the East still had home ice advantage in the opening round, so is a switch to 1 vs. 8 really better? I guess it depends on what we view as better. Different, no doubt, but I&#8217;m not sold that it is better.
2024 Western Conference: 
Current                                          1 vs. 8 
DAL (113) v. VGK (98)               DAL (113) v. VGK (98) 
VAN (109) v. NSH (99)              VAN (109) v. NSH (99) 
WPG (110) v. COL (107)             WPG (109) v. LAK (99) 
EDM (104) v. LA (99)                COL (107) v. EDM (104)
The top series remains the same, while again only the bottom two switch. It is important to note how Makar said they&#8217;ve had to play a top team in the opening round two years in a row, but under the 1 vs. 8 format, they would have faced Edmonton instead of Winnipeg. Is that really easier? I&#8217;m sure Jets fans would prefer the 1-8 format in this scenario, as they would have faced LA, and maybe the Kings wouldn&#8217;t have torched the Jets and Connor Hellebuyck as badly as the Avalanche did.
2025 Eastern Conference:
Current:                                            1 vs. 8 
WSH (111) v. MTL (91)                WSH (111) v. MTL (91) 
TOR (108) v. OTT (97)                TOR (108) v. NJD (91) 
TBL (102) v. FLA (98)                 TBL (102) v. OTT (97) 
CAR (99) v. NJD (91)                  CAR (99) v. FLA (98)
The top-four teams would still have had home ice, but only WSH would have had the same opponent. Tampa Bay would have likely preferred to play Ottawa, I&#8217;m sure, as they lost in five to Florida. Carolina would have had a tougher path facing the Panthers in round one instead of the Devils.
The only likely difference would have had Tampa winning a round and Carolina losing theirs, but again, that is just a projection, as we will never know for sure. I&#8217;d rather see a guaranteed FLA/TBL series than maybe have one later in the playoffs, which is often an argument for 1 vs. 8. I get the theory, and it makes sense, but it doesn&#8217;t mean it would always occur.
2025 Western Conference: 
Current                                          1 vs. 8 
WPG (116) v. STL (96)              WPG (116) v. STL (96) 
VGK (110) v. MIN (97)              VGK (110) v. MIN (97) 
DAL (106) v. COL (102)            DAL (106) v. EDM (101) 
LAK (105) v. EDM (101)            LAK (105) v. COL (102)
We&#8217;d have the same top series and the same four teams with home ice in the opening round. The only difference is that EDM would have been in DAL, and COL would have been in LA.
Makar&#8217;s claim of playing a top-six team wouldn&#8217;t have changed. Dallas was fifth in the NHL, LA was sixth, COL was eighth, and EDM was ninth. We are talking about a one-point difference, and would that point margin be different with a different schedule?
<hr />
<figure id="attachment_153458" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-153458" style="width: 1024px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-large wp-image-153458" src="http://publish.oilersnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/USATSI_23309238-1024x683.jpg" alt="Dallas Stars Colorado Avalanche" width="1024" height="683" srcset="https://publish.oilersnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/USATSI_23309238-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https://publish.oilersnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/USATSI_23309238-300x200.jpg 300w, https://publish.oilersnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/USATSI_23309238-768x512.jpg 768w, https://publish.oilersnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/USATSI_23309238-1536x1024.jpg 1536w, https://publish.oilersnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/USATSI_23309238-2048x1365.jpg 2048w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-153458" class="wp-caption-text">May 17, 2024; Denver, Colorado, USA; Dallas Stars left wing Jamie Benn (14) and Colorado Avalanche center Nathan MacKinnon (29) greet each other following a double overtime period in game six of the second round of the 2024 Stanley Cup Playoffs at Ball Arena.</figcaption></figure>
<hr />
<h2>FORMAT CHANGE&#8230;</h2>
If you want to change the format, would you also change the schedule?
Here is the current schedule:
32 games (twice vs. each team) against the 16 teams in the other conference. 
26 games within own division. You play five teams four times, and the other two teams three times. (Starting in 2026-27, it will be 28 games within your division as teams play 84 games). 
24 games against the other division in your conference, playing each team three times.
Starting in 2026-27, there will be 28 games within the division, as the league expands to an 84-game schedule. And with rumours of expansion looming, two of the divisions will expand by one team, thus altering the schedule again. We might see an evenly balanced schedule for 2-3 years before expansion comes, and it forces another change to the schedule.
The NHL playoff format has changed many times over the years. When the league expanded to 21 teams in 1980, for the next two seasons, it was 1 vs. 16 down to 8 vs. 9.
In 1982, they switched to the top-four teams in each division making the playoffs.
In 1987, they expanded all four rounds to best-of-seven. The first round used to be a best-of-five from 1980 to 1986.
In 1994, they changed to the top eight teams in each conference being seeded 1 to 8, but division winners automatically were ranked 1-2.
In 1999, they made three divisions in each conference, and the division winners were ranked 1-3, and 4-8 were the next highest in points. Format was as follows for the first two rounds, and then Conference Final and Cup Final, the same as it is now. 

Conference Quarterfinals 
Eastern Conference 
Series A: No. 1 (Division Winner) vs. No. 8 
Series B: No. 2 (Division Winner) vs. No. 7 
Series C: No. 3 (Division Winner) vs. No. 6 
Series D: No. 4 vs. No. 5
Western Conference 
Series E: No. 1 (Division Winner) vs. No. 8 
Series F: No. 2 (Division Winner) vs. No. 7 
Series G: No. 3 (Division Winner) vs. No. 6 
Series H: No. 4 vs. No. 5
Conference Semifinals 
Eastern Conference 
Series I: Top-seeded winner from Series A-D vs. Lowest-seeded winner from Series A-D 
Series J: The other two winners from Series A-D
Western Conference 
Series K: Top-seeded winner from Series E-H vs. Lowest-seeded winner from Series E-H 
Series L: The other two winners from Series E-H
In 2014, the NHL switched back to four divisions, two in each conference, and the current playoff format. The 2020 and 2021 seasons had one-off playoff formats due to COVID.
Maybe the NHL will revert back to 1 vs. 8 in the future, but will division winners be guaranteed the first and second slots? It has never had that in the past, so that would also need to change.
It is something to consider, but usually the only difference we would see is instead of the current No. 2-3 in each division playing each other, we&#8217;d see No. 3 vs. No. 6 and No. going against No. 5, which is often the same four teams, just playing different opponents. Is it really that much harder or easier when you plan an opponent with one less point in the regular season than the one you play now?
I believe nostalgia and just getting bored are often the reasons people push for a playoff format change, but ultimately, it won&#8217;t lead to better playoff matchups. It would just be different.
<hr />
<h2>Trending Edmonton Oilers Articles</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://oilersnation.com/news/report-cards-edmonton-oilers-top-prospects-rookie-game-calgary-flames">Report Cards for Top Prospects in Rookie Games against Flames</a></li>
<li><a href="https://oilersnation.com/news/nhl-notebook-pete-deboer-regrets-pinning-loss-oilers-stars-jake-oettinger">Former Stars coach regrets pinning Conference Final loss on goaltender</a></li>
<li><a href="https://oilersnation.com/news/carter-hart-almost-certainly-signing-with-u-s-based-team-ruling-out-edmonton-oilers">Carter Hart ‘almost certainly’ signing with U.S.-based team, ruling out Oilers as option</a></li>
<li><a href="https://oilersnation.com/news/monday-mailbag-how-does-kirill-kaprisov-affect-connor-mcdavids-contract-negotiations">How does Kirill Kaprizov affect Connor McDavid’s contract negotiations?</a></li>
<li><a href="https://oilersnation.com/news/edmonton-oilers-adam-henrique-depreceating-asset">Adam Henrique at risk of being passed on depth chart this season</a></li>
<li><a href="https://oilersnation.com/news/nhl-pacific-division-preview-2025-26-season">Previewing the Pacific Division for the 2025-26 NHL Season</a></li>
</ul>

The NHL playoff format is a topic that gets discussed a lot. However, I don't think a format change is necessary.



Let's start with why some fans, media, and players don't like it. They argue that you play the same team too often and that some series have two really good teams go head-to-head.

Colorado's Cale Makar said this to ESPN's Greg Wyshynski <a href="https://www.espn.com/nhl/story/_/id/46260627/nhl-2025-26-star-top-players-roundtable-playoffs-meals-dress-code">in his article from Vegas,</a> "I feel like all the players want back to No. 1 against No. 8. I think that's a thing that we'd like, but I get it. I understand the playoff format now. It makes the road harder sometimes."

When asked about how some players said the wild-card locks in the same matchups every year, Makar said, "I mean, if you're from Edmonton or L.A., I'd say so, yeah. Sometimes you get a good matchup, and sometimes you're playing a top-six team with another top-six team, like we did this past year. That's the way she goes."

Let's look at the past few seasons and see if the current format makes it harder for certain teams.

2022 Eastern Conference:

Current:                                            1 vs. 8 Format
FLA (122) v. WSH (100)              FLA (122) v. WSH (100)
CAR (116) v. BOS (107)                CAR (116) v. PIT (103)
TOR (115) v. TBL (110)                 TOR (115) v. BOS (107)
NYR (110) v. PIT (103)                 NYR (110) v. TBL (110)

All Eastern teams this year had at least 100 points. The same four teams would have had home ice advantage, but different opponents. Toronto lost to Tampa Bay in the first round. Maybe they would have beaten Boston, but history between the two teams says otherwise.

FLA, TB, CAR, and NYR won their series, so if it were 1 vs. 8, those four couldn't have advanced, as one of TOR or BOS would have. The rest would be "what if" scenarios and simply a prediction of who would have won or not. I'm not sold that the 1 v. 8 would have made the playoffs better in the East.

2022 Western Conference:
Current                                          1 vs. 8
COL (119) v. NSH (97)              COL (119) v. NSH (97)
CGY (111) v. DAL (98)               CGY (111) v. DAL (98)
MIN (113) v. STL (109)             MIN (113) v. LAK (99)
EDM (104) v. LA (99)               STL (109) v. EDM (104)

The top two series would be the same, but MIN and EDM would have swapped opponents. St. Louis would have had home ice and faced Edmonton. It would have led to significantly more travel for Minnesota — unless you removed the division, winner being guaranteed the No. 1 and No. 2 slots.

Colorado was clearly the best team, and they beat NSH, STL, and EDM to get out of the West. Would a format change have made their road easier? Hard to say, but it would have been different, as they played STL and EDM in the second and third round, and in 1 vs. 8, one of those two would have been eliminated in the first round.

Colorado was a wagon, and I'm not sure any team would have beaten them regardless of the format.

2023 Eastern Conference:

Current:                                            1 vs. 8
BOS (135) v. FLA (92)                  BOS (135) v. FLA (92)
CAR (113) v. NYI (93)                   CAR (113) v. NYI (93)
TOR (111) v. TBL (98)                   NJD (112) v. TBL (98)
NJD (112) v. NYR (107)                TOR (111) v. NYR (107)

The top-two series would have been the same, while Toronto would have played the Rangers instead of Tampa Bay, and New Jersey would have faced the Lightning.

Florida, Carolina, Toronto, and New Jersey won in 2023. Would you rather watch two non-divisional rivals or TOR-TBL and NYR-NJD? I prefer rivalries, so I'd rather have seen the matchups we saw. Toronto finally defeated Tampa Bay, so would Leafs fans change that without a guarantee they'd beat a Rangers team that had nine more points than Tampa?

2023 Western Conference:
Current                                          1 vs. 8
VGK (111) v. WPG (95)               VGK (111) v. WPG (95)
COL (109) v. SEA (100)              COL (109) v. SEA (100)
EDM (104) v. LA (104)               EDM (104) v. MIN (103)
DAL (108) v. MIN (103)             DAL (108) v. LA (104)

The top two series remain the same. Edmonton and Dallas still would have had home ice advantage; they just would have played different opponents. I'd argue that for Dallas and Edmonton, it would be a disadvantage under the 1 vs. 8, because they'd have more travel, due to LA having one more point than MIN.

Vegas would have played Seattle in the second round as they upset Colorado. Vegas beat EDM in the second round, and I think most would agree they were a better team than SEA, and I still think VGK would have won the West. We will never know, of course, but the current playoff format is better for the Western Conference due to travel. If you go 1. vs. 8, you are adding more potential travel.

Which is why: If you have four teams from each division in the playoffs, there really should be no wildcard seeding. I'd only use Wildcard when it is five from one division and three from another. Vegas would have played Seattle in the first round, and Colorado would have played Winnipeg under my plan. I much prefer that, as it sticks with the current focus of division rivalries and having more regular-season games within your division. But I digress.

2024 Eastern Conference:

Current:                                            1 vs. 8
NYR (114) v. WSH (91)                NYR (114) v. WSH (91)
FLA (113) v. TBL (98)                  FLA (113) v. NYI (94)
CAR (111) v. NYI (94)                   CAR (112) v. TBL (98)
BOS (109) v. TOR (102)               BOS (109) v. TOR (102)

The first and fourth series would have been the same in 1 vs. 8, but FLA would have played NYI while CAR would have hosted TBL. It would have taken away the FLA/TB rivalry, which was essentially the passing of the guard. Tampa had made three consecutive Stanley Cup Finals from 2020-2022, but FLA beat them, and now the Panthers have made three in a row (2023-2025), and like Tampa, they've won twice.

Maybe Tampa would have beaten Carolina and then faced Florida in the second round, but that's only a what-if. The top four teams in the East still had home ice advantage in the opening round, so is a switch to 1 vs. 8 really better? I guess it depends on what we view as better. Different, no doubt, but I'm not sold that it is better.

2024 Western Conference:
Current                                          1 vs. 8
DAL (113) v. VGK (98)               DAL (113) v. VGK (98)
VAN (109) v. NSH (99)              VAN (109) v. NSH (99)
WPG (110) v. COL (107)             WPG (109) v. LAK (99)
EDM (104) v. LA (99)                COL (107) v. EDM (104)

The top series remains the same, while again only the bottom two switch. It is important to note how Makar said they've had to play a top team in the opening round two years in a row, but under the 1 vs. 8 format, they would have faced Edmonton instead of Winnipeg. Is that really easier? I'm sure Jets fans would prefer the 1-8 format in this scenario, as they would have faced LA, and maybe the Kings wouldn't have torched the Jets and Connor Hellebuyck as badly as the Avalanche did.

2025 Eastern Conference:

Current:                                            1 vs. 8
WSH (111) v. MTL (91)                WSH (111) v. MTL (91)
TOR (108) v. OTT (97)                TOR (108) v. NJD (91)
TBL (102) v. FLA (98)                 TBL (102) v. OTT (97)
CAR (99) v. NJD (91)                  CAR (99) v. FLA (98)

The top-four teams would still have had home ice, but only WSH would have had the same opponent. Tampa Bay would have likely preferred to play Ottawa, I'm sure, as they lost in five to Florida. Carolina would have had a tougher path facing the Panthers in round one instead of the Devils.

The only likely difference would have had Tampa winning a round and Carolina losing theirs, but again, that is just a projection, as we will never know for sure. I'd rather see a guaranteed FLA/TBL series than maybe have one later in the playoffs, which is often an argument for 1 vs. 8. I get the theory, and it makes sense, but it doesn't mean it would always occur.

2025 Western Conference:
Current                                          1 vs. 8
WPG (116) v. STL (96)              WPG (116) v. STL (96)
VGK (110) v. MIN (97)              VGK (110) v. MIN (97)
DAL (106) v. COL (102)            DAL (106) v. EDM (101)
LAK (105) v. EDM (101)            LAK (105) v. COL (102)

We'd have the same top series and the same four teams with home ice in the opening round. The only difference is that EDM would have been in DAL, and COL would have been in LA.

Makar's claim of playing a top-six team wouldn't have changed. Dallas was fifth in the NHL, LA was sixth, COL was eighth, and EDM was ninth. We are talking about a one-point difference, and would that point margin be different with a different schedule?

<hr />

[caption id="attachment_153458" align="aligncenter" width="1024"]<img class="size-large wp-image-153458" src="http://publish.oilersnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/USATSI_23309238-1024x683.jpg" alt="Dallas Stars Colorado Avalanche" width="1024" height="683" /> May 17, 2024; Denver, Colorado, USA; Dallas Stars left wing Jamie Benn (14) and Colorado Avalanche center Nathan MacKinnon (29) greet each other following a double overtime period in game six of the second round of the 2024 Stanley Cup Playoffs at Ball Arena.[/caption]

<hr />

<h2>FORMAT CHANGE...</h2>
If you want to change the format, would you also change the schedule?

Here is the current schedule:

32 games (twice vs. each team) against the 16 teams in the other conference.
26 games within own division. You play five teams four times, and the other two teams three times. (Starting in 2026-27, it will be 28 games within your division as teams play 84 games).
24 games against the other division in your conference, playing each team three times.

Starting in 2026-27, there will be 28 games within the division, as the league expands to an 84-game schedule. And with rumours of expansion looming, two of the divisions will expand by one team, thus altering the schedule again. We might see an evenly balanced schedule for 2-3 years before expansion comes, and it forces another change to the schedule.

The NHL playoff format has changed many times over the years. When the league expanded to 21 teams in 1980, for the next two seasons, it was 1 vs. 16 down to 8 vs. 9.

In 1982, they switched to the top-four teams in each division making the playoffs.

In 1987, they expanded all four rounds to best-of-seven. The first round used to be a best-of-five from 1980 to 1986.

In 1994, they changed to the top eight teams in each conference being seeded 1 to 8, but division winners automatically were ranked 1-2.

In 1999, they made three divisions in each conference, and the division winners were ranked 1-3, and 4-8 were the next highest in points. Format was as follows for the first two rounds, and then Conference Final and Cup Final, the same as it is now.


Conference Quarterfinals
Eastern Conference
Series A: No. 1 (Division Winner) vs. No. 8
Series B: No. 2 (Division Winner) vs. No. 7
Series C: No. 3 (Division Winner) vs. No. 6
Series D: No. 4 vs. No. 5

Western Conference
Series E: No. 1 (Division Winner) vs. No. 8
Series F: No. 2 (Division Winner) vs. No. 7
Series G: No. 3 (Division Winner) vs. No. 6
Series H: No. 4 vs. No. 5

Conference Semifinals
Eastern Conference
Series I: Top-seeded winner from Series A-D vs. Lowest-seeded winner from Series A-D
Series J: The other two winners from Series A-D

Western Conference
Series K: Top-seeded winner from Series E-H vs. Lowest-seeded winner from Series E-H
Series L: The other two winners from Series E-H

In 2014, the NHL switched back to four divisions, two in each conference, and the current playoff format. The 2020 and 2021 seasons had one-off playoff formats due to COVID.

Maybe the NHL will revert back to 1 vs. 8 in the future, but will division winners be guaranteed the first and second slots? It has never had that in the past, so that would also need to change.

It is something to consider, but usually the only difference we would see is instead of the current No. 2-3 in each division playing each other, we'd see No. 3 vs. No. 6 and No. going against No. 5, which is often the same four teams, just playing different opponents. Is it really that much harder or easier when you plan an opponent with one less point in the regular season than the one you play now?

I believe nostalgia and just getting bored are often the reasons people push for a playoff format change, but ultimately, it won't lead to better playoff matchups. It would just be different.

<hr />

<h2>Trending Edmonton Oilers Articles</h2>
<ul>
 	<li><a href="https://oilersnation.com/news/report-cards-edmonton-oilers-top-prospects-rookie-game-calgary-flames">Report Cards for Top Prospects in Rookie Games against Flames</a></li>
 	<li><a href="https://oilersnation.com/news/nhl-notebook-pete-deboer-regrets-pinning-loss-oilers-stars-jake-oettinger">Former Stars coach regrets pinning Conference Final loss on goaltender</a></li>
 	<li><a href="https://oilersnation.com/news/carter-hart-almost-certainly-signing-with-u-s-based-team-ruling-out-edmonton-oilers">Carter Hart ‘almost certainly’ signing with U.S.-based team, ruling out Oilers as option</a></li>
 	<li><a href="https://oilersnation.com/news/monday-mailbag-how-does-kirill-kaprisov-affect-connor-mcdavids-contract-negotiations">How does Kirill Kaprizov affect Connor McDavid’s contract negotiations?</a></li>
 	<li><a href="https://oilersnation.com/news/edmonton-oilers-adam-henrique-depreceating-asset">Adam Henrique at risk of being passed on depth chart this season</a></li>
 	<li><a href="https://oilersnation.com/news/nhl-pacific-division-preview-2025-26-season">Previewing the Pacific Division for the 2025-26 NHL Season</a></li>
</ul>

Recent articles from Jason Gregor

Breaking News